TY -
GEN
AU - Pløger, John
TI -
Agonism, decision, power - The art of working unfinished
KW - Partizipation
KW - Konflikt
KW - Mouffe, C.
KW - Foucault, M.
KW - Planungspraxis
KW - Entscheidungsfindung
KW - Agonism
KW - Agonismus
PY - 2023
N2 - Veröffentlichungsversion
N2 - begutachtet (peer reviewed)
N2 - In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung / Spatial Research and Planning ; 81 (2023) 5 ; 449-460
N2 - The current debate on agonism has become fixed in an institutional approach: How can an agonistic design institutionally become a tool against forms of domination? An agonistic space needs decisions that do not silence dissensual voices with a finite decision. This paper suggests that this agonistic approach needs de-cisions or simply put, temporary decisions drawn from seeing a decision as a solution for now. A de-cision is not a no-decision, but a decision recognised as temporary. The paper proposes 'the sketch' as an appropriate mode for working de-cisionally and unfinished. By having a sketch and working de-cisionally, planners are able to invite agonistic positions to ongoing talks and to act progressively, adaptably, or rationally in the face of emerging circumstances and uncertainty. To work unfinished from a sketch transforms the planning process from being a matter of reaching a finite decision to a strife about how to understand the present and which temporary contours and directions to move on from. The paper as such thus deals with difficult praxis questions, for instance: How is it possible to allow dissent to inform planning praxis in praxis? How can quarrelling and working unfinished empower planning democracy?
UR - http://slubdd.de/katalog?TN_libero_mab2
ER -