Michels, Lars
[Author];
Koirala, Nabin
[Author];
Groppa, Sergiu
[Author];
Luechinger, Roger
[Author];
Gantenbein, Andreas R.
[Author];
Sandor, Peter S.
[Author];
Kollias, Spyros
[Author];
Riederer, Franz
[Author];
Muthuraman, Muthuraman
[Author]
Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine
Contributor:
Michels, Lars
[Author];
Koirala, Nabin
[Author];
Groppa, Sergiu
[Author];
Luechinger, Roger
[Author];
Gantenbein, Andreas R.
[Author];
Sandor, Peter S.
[Author];
Kollias, Spyros
[Author];
Riederer, Franz
[Author];
Muthuraman, Muthuraman
[Author]
Published:
Augsburg University Publication Server (OPUS), 2021
Language:
English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01216-8
Origination:
Footnote:
Diese Datenquelle enthält auch Bestandsnachweise, die nicht zu einem Volltext führen.
Description:
Background Migraine is a primary headache disorder that can be classified into an episodic (EM) and a chronic form (CM). Network analysis within the graph-theoretical framework based on connectivity patterns provides an approach to observe large-scale structural integrity. We test the hypothesis that migraineurs are characterized by a segregated network. Methods 19 healthy controls (HC), 17 EM patients and 12 CM patients were included. Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes were computed, and topology was analyzed using a graph theory analytical framework and network-based statistics. We further used support vector machines regression (SVR) to identify whether these network measures were able to predict clinical parameters. Results Network based statistics revealed significantly lower interregional connectivity strength between anatomical compartments including the fronto-temporal, parietal and visual areas in EM and CM when compared to HC. Higher assortativity was seen in both patients’ group, with higher modularity for CM and higher transitivity for EM compared to HC. For subcortical networks, higher assortativity and transitivity were observed for both patients’ group with higher modularity for CM. SVR revealed that network measures could robustly predict clinical parameters for migraineurs. Conclusion We found global network disruption for EM and CM indicated by highly segregated network in migraine patients compared to HC. Higher modularity but lower clustering coefficient in CM is suggestive of more segregation in this group compared to EM. The presence of a segregated network could be a sign of maladaptive reorganization of headache related brain circuits, leading to migraine attacks or secondary alterations to pain.