> Details

Vogt, Ferdinand; Santarpino, Giuseppe; Fujita, Buntaro; Frerker, Christian; Bauer, Timm; Beckmann, Andreas; Bekeredjian, Raffi; Bleiziffer, Sabine; Möllmann, Helge; Walther, Thomas; Beyersdorf, Friedhelm; Hamm, Christian; Böning, Andreas; Baldus, Stephan; Ensminger, Stephan; Fischlein, Theodor; Eckner, Dennis; Möllmann, Helge; Walther, Thomas; Beyersdorf, Friedhelm; Hamm, Christian; Ensminger, Stephan

Surgical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50–69 years—insights from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY)

Reference
management

Bookmarks

Remove from
bookmarks

Share this on Whatsapp

Close

Bookmarks



You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
  • Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Surgical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50–69 years—insights from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY)
  • Contributor: Vogt, Ferdinand; Santarpino, Giuseppe; Fujita, Buntaro; Frerker, Christian; Bauer, Timm; Beckmann, Andreas; Bekeredjian, Raffi; Bleiziffer, Sabine; Möllmann, Helge; Walther, Thomas; Beyersdorf, Friedhelm; Hamm, Christian; Böning, Andreas; Baldus, Stephan; Ensminger, Stephan; Fischlein, Theodor; Eckner, Dennis; Möllmann, Helge; Walther, Thomas; Beyersdorf, Friedhelm; Hamm, Christian; Ensminger, Stephan
  • imprint: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2022
  • Published in: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac286
  • ISSN: 1010-7940; 1873-734X
  • Keywords: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ; Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ; General Medicine ; Surgery
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p /> <jats:sec> <jats:title>OBJECTIVES</jats:title> <jats:p>The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of patients between 50 and 69 years of age undergoing biological or mechanical aortic valve replacement.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>METHODS</jats:title> <jats:p>Data were collected from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Data were analysed regarding baseline characteristics and outcome parameters such as 5-year survival, stroke and reintervention.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title> <jats:p>In total,</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title> </jats:title> <jats:p>3046 patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement between 2011 and 2012 were investigated and a propensity score matching was performed. Within this period, 2239 patients received a biological prostheses, while 807 patients received a mechanical prosthesis. Mean age in the biological group was 63.07 (±5.11) and 57.34 (±4.67) in the mechanical group (standardized mean difference 1.172). In the overall cohort, there were more female patients in the biological group (32.7% vs 28.4%) and log EuroSCORE I was higher (5.41% vs 4.26%). After propensity matching (610 pairs), there was no difference in the mortality at 5-year follow-up (12.1% biological vs 9.2% mechanical P = 0.05) nor for reoperation/reintervention (2.5% biological vs 2.0% mechanical, P = 0.546). Patients undergoing mechanical aortic valve replacement suffered from a higher stroke rate 3.3% vs 1.5% (P = 0.04) at 5-year follow-up.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS</jats:title> <jats:p>Aortic valve replacement with biological or mechanical prostheses showed similar 5-year outcomes for survival and reoperation in a propensity-matched cohort, but significantly increased stroke rate after mechanical aortic valve replacement. This could influence the choice of a mechanical valve in younger patients.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Access State: Open Access