A Critical Review of the Impact of Sarcoma on Psychosocial Wellbeing

Media type: E-Article
Title: A Critical Review of the Impact of Sarcoma on Psychosocial Wellbeing
Contributor: Storey, Lesley; Fern, Lorna A.; Martins, Ana; Wells, Mary; Bennister, Lindsey; Gerrand, Craig; Onasanya, Maria; Whelan, Jeremy S.; Windsor, Rachael; Woodford, Julie; Taylor, Rachel M.
Published: Hindawi Limited, 2019
Published in: Sarcoma
Extent: 1-18
Language: English
DOI: 10.1155/2019/9730867
ISSN: 1357-714X; 1369-1643
Keywords: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ; Oncology
Abstract: <jats:p><jats:italic>Background</jats:italic>. Previous reviews of outcomes in specific sarcoma populations suggest patients have poor quality of life. In most of these reviews, there is a predominant focus on physical function rather than psychosocial outcome. The aim of this review was to describe the psychosocial impact of diagnosis and treatment on patients with all types of sarcoma. <jats:italic>Methods</jats:italic>. Searches were conducted through six electronic databases for publications of any study design using a validated patient-reported outcome measure reporting the psychosocial impact in this population. <jats:italic>Results</jats:italic>. Eighty-two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most (65%) were assessed of being of reasonable quality. The most common aspect of psychosocial wellbeing measured was quality of life (80%). Due to the heterogeneity of methods, outcomes, and populations, it was not possible to make definitive conclusions. It seems there is an improvement in the physical aspects of quality of life over time but not in psychosocial function or mental health. There was no change in mental health scores, but patients reported an improvement in adjusting to normal life. There are no differences according to the type of surgery patients receive, and psychosocial outcomes tend to be poorer than the general population. There is no consistency in identifying the factors that predict/influence psychosocial wellbeing. <jats:italic>Conclusion</jats:italic>. The published literature does not provide a clear understanding of the impact of sarcoma diagnosis and treatment on psychosocial wellbeing. Instead, the review demonstrates a need for well-designed studies in this area and a more consistent approach to the measurement of patient-reported outcomes, which include psychosocial domains. Recommendations for future research have been proposed.</jats:p>
Description: <jats:p><jats:italic>Background</jats:italic>. Previous reviews of outcomes in specific sarcoma populations suggest patients have poor quality of life. In most of these reviews, there is a predominant focus on physical function rather than psychosocial outcome. The aim of this review was to describe the psychosocial impact of diagnosis and treatment on patients with all types of sarcoma. <jats:italic>Methods</jats:italic>. Searches were conducted through six electronic databases for publications of any study design using a validated patient-reported outcome measure reporting the psychosocial impact in this population. <jats:italic>Results</jats:italic>. Eighty-two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most (65%) were assessed of being of reasonable quality. The most common aspect of psychosocial wellbeing measured was quality of life (80%). Due to the heterogeneity of methods, outcomes, and populations, it was not possible to make definitive conclusions. It seems there is an improvement in the physical aspects of quality of life over time but not in psychosocial function or mental health. There was no change in mental health scores, but patients reported an improvement in adjusting to normal life. There are no differences according to the type of surgery patients receive, and psychosocial outcomes tend to be poorer than the general population. There is no consistency in identifying the factors that predict/influence psychosocial wellbeing. <jats:italic>Conclusion</jats:italic>. The published literature does not provide a clear understanding of the impact of sarcoma diagnosis and treatment on psychosocial wellbeing. Instead, the review demonstrates a need for well-designed studies in this area and a more consistent approach to the measurement of patient-reported outcomes, which include psychosocial domains. Recommendations for future research have been proposed.</jats:p>
Footnote:
Access State: Open Access

Search in field:

Recently searched for: