Schilling, Jörg;
Kurbacher, Christian M.;
Hanusch, Claus;
Busch, Steffi;
Holländer, Martin;
Kreiss-Sender, Janine;
Rezek, Daniela;
Flahaut, Elisa;
Karthaus, Meinolf
Quality of Life Effects of an Oral Fixed Combination of Netupitant and Palonosetron in Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Prevention: Real-World Evidence in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Anthracycline-Cyclophosphamide-Based Chemotherapy
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Quality of Life Effects of an Oral Fixed Combination of Netupitant and Palonosetron in Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Prevention: Real-World Evidence in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Anthracycline-Cyclophosphamide-Based Chemotherapy
Contributor:
Schilling, Jörg;
Kurbacher, Christian M.;
Hanusch, Claus;
Busch, Steffi;
Holländer, Martin;
Kreiss-Sender, Janine;
Rezek, Daniela;
Flahaut, Elisa;
Karthaus, Meinolf
Published:
S. Karger AG, 2022
Published in:
Breast Care, 17 (2022) 2, Seite 130-136
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1159/000514891
ISSN:
1661-3791;
1661-3805
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> In a prospective non-interventional study involving 2,173 patients, we showed that use of the oral fixed combination of netupitant 300 mg and palonosetron 0.5 mg (NEPA) for prevention of chemotherapy (Ctx)-induced nausea and vomiting has beneficial effects on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with various types of cancers receiving highly or moderately emetogenic Ctx. Here, we report on the effects on QoL, effectiveness, and tolerability of NEPA in patients with breast cancer exposed to anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)-based Ctx. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a post hoc subanalysis of a prospective non-interventional study in 1,197 patients with breast cancer receiving up to 3 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide and NEPA. NEPA administration was per the summary of product characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In cycle 1 of Ctx, a large proportion of patients (84%) reported “no impact on daily life” (NIDL) due to vomiting; 53% of patients reported NIDL due to nausea. The complete response rate was 86/88/81% in the acute/delayed/overall phase in cycle 1, and NEPA was well tolerated throughout the study. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The real-world beneficial effects of NEPA prophylaxis on QoL were confirmed for patients with breast cancer receiving AC. NEPA was effective with a good safety profile in this patient population in clinical practice.