Description:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>Background. Management of patients with suspected Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is problematic if diagnostic imaging is not available. Pretest Clinical Probability (PCP) and D-dimer (D-d) assessment were shown to be useful to identify those high risk patients for whom empirical, protective anticoagulation is indicated (Siragusa S et al. Arch Intern Med2004;164:2477–82).</jats:p>
<jats:p>Objective of the study. In consecutive patients with suspected PE, we evaluated whether PCP and D-d assessment, together with the use of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), allow objective appraisal of PE to be deferred for up to 72 hours.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Methods. In case of deferment of diagnostic imaging for PE, patients identified at high-risk (those with high PCP and those with moderate PCP and a positive D-d), received a protective full-dose treatment of LMWH; the remaining patients were discharged without anticoagulants. All patients were scheduled to undergo objective tests for PE (ventilation/perfusion lung scanning or computed tomography lung scan) within 72 hours from the index visit (figure). Standard antithrombotic therapy was then administered when diagnostic tests confirmed Venous ThromboEmbolism (VTE).</jats:p>
<jats:p>Results. 336 patients with suspected PE were included in this study. The prevalence of VTE was 6.1% (95% CI 2.7–9.3) in the “low-risk group” and 50.4% (95% CI 41.7–59.1) in the “high-risk group”. In total, VTE was confirmed in 76 (22.6%) of 336 patients (95% CI 18.2–27). Patients’ characteristics, median time for deferral test and for LMWH administration are listed in table 1. Events at the short-term (72 hours) and long-term follow-up are listed in table 2. None of the patients had major bleeding events during the follow-ups.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Conclusions. When objective diagnostic assessment of PE is not immediately available, management of symptomatic PE patients can prove highly unsatisfactory. This study demonstrates that a simple and reproducible approach allows a safe deferral of diagnostic imaging for PE for up to 72 hours.</jats:p>
<jats:p>patients’ characteristics Baseline features Low risk group (n. 211) High-risk group (n. 125) p value n.s.: not significant Age in years (range) 59.3 (22–91) 60.3 (23–91) n.s. Sex (F/M) 98/113 59/66 n.s. Time since onset of symptoms (days) 1.7 1.5 n.s. Co-morbidity and 16 (7.5) 25 (19.2) 0.03 Median time of deferral test (hours) 49.5 42.5 n.s. Median time of protective anticoagulation (hours) not applicable 35.5 not applicable Outcome of Short- and Long-term FU Categories of patients (n) Events at the short-term FU Events at the long -term FU* FU indicates follow-up; CI indicates Confidence Intervals. *This refers to patients in whom Pulmonary Embolism has been previously ruled out (n. 260). “Low-risk group” (211) 0 (0%) [95% CI 1.4] 0 (0%) [95% CI 1.4] “High-risk group” (125) 1 (0.8%) [95% CI 2.3] 3 (2.4%) [95% CI 3.2]</jats:p>
<jats:p>Patients clinically suspected of PE without immediate availability of diagnostic tests Patients clinically suspected of PE without immediate availability of diagnostic tests</jats:p>