• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Was It a Type II Error?
  • Contributor: Pascoe, John M.
  • imprint: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), 1981
  • Published in: Pediatrics
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1542/peds.68.1.149b
  • ISSN: 0031-4005; 1098-4275
  • Keywords: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:p>Dr Oski's controlled study (Pediatrics 66:168, 1980) comparing the gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of a group (N = 44) of infants receiving formula with iron and a group (N = 49) receiving formula with no iron was well conceived and practical. However, his concluding statement "...our study failed to provide any evidence for the commonly held belief that iron-fortified formulas produce gastrointestinal side effects in infants," was not supported conclusively by his data.</jats:p> <jats:p>A recent review article emphasizes the importance of type II errors in clinical controlled trials.1</jats:p>