• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: The Effect of Contrast Agents on Dose Calculations of Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy Plans for Critical Structures
  • Beteiligte: Elawadi, A. A.; AlMohsen, Safa; AlGendy, Reham; Allazkani, Hosam; Mohamed, Reham A.; AlAssaf, Hossam; Nisbet, Andrew; Alshanqity, Mukhtar
  • Erschienen: MDPI AG, 2021
  • Erschienen in: Applied Sciences
  • Umfang: 8355
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.3390/app11188355
  • ISSN: 2076-3417
  • Schlagwörter: Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes ; Computer Science Applications ; Process Chemistry and Technology ; General Engineering ; Instrumentation ; General Materials Science
  • Zusammenfassung: <jats:p>Radiotherapy dose calculation requires accurate Computed Tomography (CT) imaging while tissue delineation may necessitate the use of contrast agents (CA). Acquiring these two sets is a common practice in radiotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the effect of CA on the dose calculations. Two hundred and twenty-six volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) patients that had planning CT with contrast (CCT) and non-contrast CT (NCCT) of different cancer sites (e.g., brain, head, and neck (H&amp;N), chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were evaluated. Treatment plans were recalculated using CCT, then compared to NCCT. The variation in Hounsfield units (HU) and dose distributions for critical structures and target volumes were analyzed using mean HU, mean and maximum relative dose values, D2%, D98%, and 3D gamma analysis. HU variations were statistically significant for most structures. However, this was not clinically significant as the difference in mean HU values was within 30 HU for soft tissue and 50 HU for lungs. Variation in target volumes’ D2% and D98% were insignificant for all sites except brain and nasopharynx. Dose maximum differences were within 2% for the majority of critical structures and target volumes. 3D gamma analysis results revealed that majority of plans satisfied the 2% and 2 mm criteria. CCT may be acquired for VMAT radiotherapy planning purposes instead of NCCT, since there is no clinically significant difference in dose calculations based on either image set.</jats:p>
  • Beschreibung: <jats:p>Radiotherapy dose calculation requires accurate Computed Tomography (CT) imaging while tissue delineation may necessitate the use of contrast agents (CA). Acquiring these two sets is a common practice in radiotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the effect of CA on the dose calculations. Two hundred and twenty-six volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) patients that had planning CT with contrast (CCT) and non-contrast CT (NCCT) of different cancer sites (e.g., brain, head, and neck (H&amp;N), chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were evaluated. Treatment plans were recalculated using CCT, then compared to NCCT. The variation in Hounsfield units (HU) and dose distributions for critical structures and target volumes were analyzed using mean HU, mean and maximum relative dose values, D2%, D98%, and 3D gamma analysis. HU variations were statistically significant for most structures. However, this was not clinically significant as the difference in mean HU values was within 30 HU for soft tissue and 50 HU for lungs. Variation in target volumes’ D2% and D98% were insignificant for all sites except brain and nasopharynx. Dose maximum differences were within 2% for the majority of critical structures and target volumes. 3D gamma analysis results revealed that majority of plans satisfied the 2% and 2 mm criteria. CCT may be acquired for VMAT radiotherapy planning purposes instead of NCCT, since there is no clinically significant difference in dose calculations based on either image set.</jats:p>
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang