Published:
Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research, September 2016
Published in:NBER working paper series ; no. w22644
Extent:
1 Online-Ressource
Language:
English
DOI:
10.3386/w22644
Identifier:
Reproduction note:
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Origination:
Footnote:
Mode of access: World Wide Web
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files
Description:
Benefit-cost analyses of health regulations traditionally evaluate their economic efficiency--ignoring equity. To help address the importance of equity, we develop a survey to elicit respondents' preferences towards equality in health risks stemming from environmental causes. Survey responses are used to parameterize an Atkinson index over environmental health risks. We compare these results to similar questions in the income context and find that respondents are significantly more averse to inequality in health risks than in income. The mean respondent is willing to accept a 22% increase in average health risk if risks are equally distributed in the population, but willing to accept a decrease of only 5% in average income if incomes are equally distributed in the population. We find that 30% of respondents answer health risk questions lexicographically--always preferring an equal distribution of risks to an unequal distribution, even if the latter makes everyone better off