Götz, Julia
[Author]
;
Jünger, Michael
[Degree supervisor];
Strölin, Anke
[Degree supervisor]Universität Greifswald
Tragekomfort und Veränderung des transepidermalen Wasserverlusts von knielangen Kompressionsstrümpfen mit einem Anpressdruck von 18-21mmHg im Vergleich zu 23-32 mmHg bei Menschen höheren Alters nach einem eintägigen Trageversuch
: Einfluss von Fußdeformationen, Rheuma und Arthrose
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Book;
Thesis
Title:
Tragekomfort und Veränderung des transepidermalen Wasserverlusts von knielangen Kompressionsstrümpfen mit einem Anpressdruck von 18-21mmHg im Vergleich zu 23-32 mmHg bei Menschen höheren Alters nach einem eintägigen Trageversuch
:
Einfluss von Fußdeformationen, Rheuma und Arthrose
University thesis:
Dissertation, Universitätsmedizin der Universität Greifswald, 2019
Footnote:
Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 131-153
Description:
Kompressionstherapie
Background: Although the efficacy of compression therapy through knee-length compression stockings with an interface pressure of 18–21 mmHg for leg oedemas has been confirmed by many studies, 91% of patients are still treated with a higher interface pressure. Method: In this prospective open randomised monocentric study 19 patients (age ≥65, movement restrictions and symptomatic leg oedema) received knee-length compression stockings with an interface pressure of 18–21 mmHg (stocking type 1) and 23–32 mmHg (stocking type 2). On two consecutive days each of the two compression stocking types were worn for at least 8 hours. After this test period, both stocking types were assessed subjectively and skin changes were recorded. In addition, transepidermal water loss was measured before the start of the study and after each wear test. The p-values are given with a significance level of p≤0.05 (5%). Result: The Stocking type 1 recorded a significantly (p=0,045) better wearing comfort. The Stocking type 2 was significantly too large amongst women in the front foot area (p=0.044). The most common side effects were constrictions on the proximal lower leg (stocking type 1 =73,7% (14/19); stocking type 2 =78,9% (15/19)). Subjects with arthritis (p=0.006), hallux valgus (p=0.034) and/or digitus flexus (p=0.021) found the socking type 1 significantly more comfortable. An increase in transepidermal water loss was detected in both Ccl1 (p = 0.7761) and Ccl2 (p = 0.200). Moreover, the Ccl2 ...