• Media type: E-Book
  • Title: The effects of integrated soil fertility management on household welfare in Ethiopia
  • Contributor: Hörner, Denise [VerfasserIn]; Wollni, Meike [VerfasserIn]
  • imprint: Göttingen: RTG 1666 GlobalFood, University of Goettingen, April 2020
  • Published in: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen: GlobalFood discussion papers ; 142
  • Extent: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 35 Seiten)
  • Language: English
  • Identifier:
  • Keywords: Graue Literatur
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) is a technology package consisting of the joint use of improved seeds, organic and inorganic fertilizers. It is increasingly promoted to enhance soil fertility, crop productivity and income of smallholder farmers. While studies find positive effects of ISFM at the plot level, to date there is little evidence on its broader welfare implications. This is important since system technologies like ISFM mostly involve higher labor and capital investments, and it remains unclear whether these pay off at the household level. Using data from maize, wheat and teff growing farmers in two agroecological zones in Ethiopia, we assess the impact of ISFM on crop and household income, and households’ likelihood to engage in other economic activities. We further study effects on labor demand, food security and children's education. We use the inverse probability weighting regression adjustment method, and propensity score matching as robustness check. We find that ISFM adoption for maize, wheat or teff increases income obtained from these crops in both agroecological zones. Yet, only in one subsample, it also increases household income, while in the other it is associated with a reduced likelihood to achieve income from other crops and off-farm activities. Results further show that ISFM increases labor demand. Moreover, we find positive effects of ISFM on food security and primary school enrollment in those regions where it goes along with gains in household income. We conclude that welfare effects of agricultural innovations depend on farmers income diversification strategies.
  • Access State: Open Access