Footnote:
Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments August 16, 2007 erstellt
Description:
We examine the occurrence of ethics-related terms in 10-K annual reports over 1994-2006 and offer empirical observations on the conceptual framework of Erhard, Jensen, and Zaffron (2007). We use a pre-Sarbanes-Oxley sample subset to compare the occurrence of ethics-related terms in our 10-K data with samples from other studies that consider virtue-related phenomena. We find that firms using ethics-related terms are more likely to be quot;sinquot; stocks, are more likely to be the object of class action lawsuits, and are more likely to score poorly on measures of corporate governance. The consistency of our results across these alternative measures of ethical behavior suggests that managers who portray their firm as quot;ethicalquot; in 10-K reports are more likely to be systematically misleading the public. These results are consistent with the integrity-performance paradox