> Details

Manne, Geoffrey A. [Author] ; Boliek, Babette [Other]; Cooper, James C. [Other]; Epstein, Richard [Other]; Hazlett, Thomas W. [Other]; Hurwitz, Justin (Gus) [Other]; Klick, Jonathan [Other]; Lambert, Thomas A. [Other]; Lipsky, Tad [Other]; Teece, David [Other]; Wright, Joshua D. [Other]; Yoo, Christopher S. [Other]

Amicus Brief of Antitrust Law & Economics Scholars, Ohio v. American Express

Reference
management

Bookmarks

Remove from
bookmarks

Share this on Whatsapp

Close

Bookmarks



You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
  • Media type: E-Book
  • Title: Amicus Brief of Antitrust Law & Economics Scholars, Ohio v. American Express
  • Contributor: Manne, Geoffrey A. [Author]; Boliek, Babette [Other]; Cooper, James C. [Other]; Epstein, Richard [Other]; Hazlett, Thomas W. [Other]; Hurwitz, Justin (Gus) [Other]; Klick, Jonathan [Other]; Lambert, Thomas A. [Other]; Lipsky, Tad [Other]; Teece, David [Other]; Wright, Joshua D. [Other]; Yoo, Christopher S. [Other]
  • Published: [S.l.]: SSRN, [2020]
  • Published in: University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming
  • Extent: 1 Online-Ressource (61 p)
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3384353
  • Identifier:
  • Origination:
  • Footnote: Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments January 25, 2018 erstellt
  • Description: This brief explains amici's understanding of the relevant economic analysis. It explains why basic economic principles underlying the analysis of multi-sided markets lead to the conclusion that a plaintiff should be required to demonstrate, at a minimum, that: (1) the allegedly unlawful restraint caused anticompetitive effects in the form of actual or probable restricted output market-wide—a showing that logically requires analyzing both sides of a two-sided market; and (2) the defendant had sufficient market power to restrict output in a properly defined market. These two requirements align with sound economics and would also provide clear guidance for courts in applying the rule of reason
  • Access State: Open Access