• Media type: E-Book
  • Title: From Wisdom to Wisdom of the Crowd and Crowdfunding
  • Contributor: Bechter, Clemens [Author]; Jentzsch, Stefan [Other]; Frey, Michael [Other]
  • Published: [S.l.]: SSRN, [2017]
  • Extent: 1 Online-Ressource (8 p)
  • Language: English
  • Origination:
  • Footnote: In: Journal of Communication and Computer, Forthcoming
    Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments May 24, 2011 erstellt
  • Description: This research aims at encouraging the academic community to broaden the body of knowledge by bridging the gap between IT (social networks), finance (crowdfunding) philosophy, and cultural distances. Western philosophy treats wisdom as outcome of knowledge and judgment about uncertainty. Asian philosophy treats wisdom as an outcome produced by a wise person; wise persons such as teachers are approximations to wisdom but not wisdom in itself. Whereas some philosophers stress the idea of individual wisdom e.g., Sun Tzu and Nietzsche, others e.g., Confucius and Kant point into another direction: the wisdom of the group or crowd. Surowiecki (2005) states that the averages of individual guesses of the crowd display more wisdom than individuals, even more than most competent experts. Applications of the wisdom of crowds are currently found in three major categories: prediction, crowdsourcing, and crowdfunding; all supported by social networks and the network effect. The authors' empirical research focused on crowdfunding. In a study, post-graduate executives had to draft business plans of their choice being financed by crowdfunding. Preliminary findings suggest that the usage of Twitter and Facebook correlates with each other. One cluster, predominantly South-Asians, make less use of social networks for promoting crowdfunded projects than the other group, namely, East-Asians and Europeans. Two third of proposed projects dealt with commercialization of a product or service, remaining part being non-profit ones. Wisdom of the crowd follows a bottom-up approach whereas classical philosophy a more top-down orientation. Bridging the gap will be a major challenge. Confucius and Kant, although not being exposed to the capabilities of today's social networks, show high appreciation of the wisdom of the group/crowd. However, there are certain parameters to be implemented if the crowd should arrive at wise decisions
  • Access State: Open Access