Footnote:
In: Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 44, 2015
Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments April 25, 2015 erstellt
Description:
Under the usual tort rules, damages for an accident equal the victim's loss (compensation). This paper departs from current law by proposing damages equal to the injurer's gain from untaken precaution divided by the probability of liability (disgorgement damages for accidents, or DDA). DDA is the minimum liability necessary to provide injurers with efficient incentives for care. DDA is smaller than compensation, so it typically induces more activity by injurers and less activity by victims. Calculating DDA generally requires different information than compensation. Consequently, some imperfections in information cause courts to distort incentives for care under compensatory damages and not DDA, while others have the opposite effect. Furthermore, the smaller size of damages under DDA compared to compensation can shrink or magnify the distortion in incentives for care caused by court and injurer errors. We distinguish three forms of DDA with different information requirements and the same incentive effects