Published in:Chicago Booth Research Paper ; No. 12-20
Extent:
1 Online-Ressource (71 p)
Language:
English
DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.2089459
Identifier:
Origination:
Footnote:
Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments October 1, 2012 erstellt
Description:
We examine the after-tax returns and tax efficiency of Size, Value, Growth, and Momentum equity styles. Examining portfolios commonly used in the literature and practice we find that Value and Momentum have the highest tax exposures, but continue to outperform the market on an after-tax basis. Momentum and Value face similar tax rates, despite Momentum having five times the turnover of Value, because Value is exposed to high dividend income, while Momentum's exposure is primarily capital gains. We then construct tax optimized portfolios to assess how taxes can be improved within each style. We find that managing capital gains incurs less tracking error than avoiding dividend income. Hence, optimal tax trading improves capital gain-heavy styles such as Momentum without incurring significant style drift, while income-heavy styles such as Value are more difficult to improve. Tax optimization, therefore, further increases the after-tax outperformance of Momentum relative to Value and Growth