• Media type: E-Book
  • Title: Quantitative vs. Qualitative Criteria for Credit Risk Assessment
  • Contributor: Soares, João O. [Author]; Pina, Joaquim [Other]; Ribeiro, Manuel [Other]; Lopes, Margarida Catalao [Other]
  • imprint: [S.l.]: SSRN, [2013]
  • Extent: 1 Online-Ressource (19 p)
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2012443
  • Identifier:
  • Origination:
  • Footnote: In: Frontiers in Finance and Economics, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 69-87, 2011
    Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments April 1, 2011 erstellt
  • Description: The existing vast literature on credit risk assessment and default prediction provides models building mostly in quantitative indicators. We present the results of a survey carried out of experts from the main banks in Portugal, conveying evidence on the dominant procedures undertaken by the Portuguese banking system. Our analysis concludes on the relevance of qualitative criteria, particularly management's experience and reliability, and on their significant negative correlation with banks' default records. Within this context the paper reflects on the role of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) models as a way to process credit risk assessment integrating qualitative and quantitative aspects
  • Access State: Open Access