> Details

Gandhi, Linnea [Author]; Milkman, Katherine L. [Author]; Ellis, Sean [Author]; Graci, Heather [Author]; Gromet, Dena [Author]; Mobarak, Rayyan [Author]; Buttenheim, Alison [Author]; Duckworth, Angela [Author]; Pope, Devin G. [Author]; Stanford, Ala [Author]; Thaler, Richard H. [Author]; Volpp, Kevin [Author]

An Experiment Evaluating the Impact of Large-Scale, High-Payoff Vaccine Regret Lotteries

Reference
management

Bookmarks

Remove from
bookmarks

Share this on Whatsapp

Close

Bookmarks



You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
  • Media type: E-Book
  • Title: An Experiment Evaluating the Impact of Large-Scale, High-Payoff Vaccine Regret Lotteries
  • Contributor: Gandhi, Linnea [Author]; Milkman, Katherine L. [Author]; Ellis, Sean [Author]; Graci, Heather [Author]; Gromet, Dena [Author]; Mobarak, Rayyan [Author]; Buttenheim, Alison [Author]; Duckworth, Angela [Author]; Pope, Devin G. [Author]; Stanford, Ala [Author]; Thaler, Richard H. [Author]; Volpp, Kevin [Author]
  • Published: [S.l.]: SSRN, [2021]
  • Extent: 1 Online-Ressource (28 p)
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3904365
  • Identifier:
  • Origination:
  • Footnote: Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments August 13, 2021 erstellt
  • Description: We present a pre-registered experiment testing the effects of three, high-payoff (up to $50,000) vaccine regret lotteries in Philadelphia. In each drawing, residents of a randomly selected “treatment” zip code received half of the 12 lottery prizes (boosting their chances to 59-98x those of their neighbors). Our quasi-experimental results yield mixed estimates of the benefits of these lotteries for Philadelphia’s overall vaccination rate. Our experimental results, however, offer a causal estimate of the limited return on even high-odds vaccine lotteries. Difference-in-difference regressions estimate the first treated zip code experienced an insignificant 11% jump in vaccinations compared to control zip codes. Pooling results from all three, we do not detect significant benefits from treatment, and our 95% confidence interval bounds the benefits at 9%
  • Access State: Open Access