Footnote:
Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments July 2003 erstellt
Description:
Increasing commercial and cultural internationalisation and amalgamation have had and will continue to have their consequences in the law of all legal systems. In particular the two great Western legal traditions, the Common Law and the Civil Law system, have become closer to each other during the last decades. This paper analyses the impact, mechanisms and future developments of the convergence of the two systems. It is divided into seven parts. After some introductory remarks on the distinction between Common Law and Civil Law systems, this paper will briefly contrast the pros and cons of convergence. The next section examines how some of the previously visible differences between Common Law and Civil Law systems have already been diminished or are about to decrease. The analysis will focus on the trend towards codification in many Common Law countries, the approaches towards the filling of gaps in statutory provisions, judicial activism, the doctrine of stare decisis and the roles of judges and legal scholars. It then looks into the various mechanisms and factors that contribute to the process of convergence, such as the importance of American law, the unification of Europe and the unification of legal rules by means of conventions and model laws. The final part will examine which elements of both systems should prevail in the legal evolution of convergence, in order to make the newly emerging system more efficient. It will be argued that the Civil Law, due to its economy and ability to quickly react to changing societal parameters, is better equipped to meet the challenges of today's fast-paced world