Footnote:
Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments October 2003 erstellt
Description:
In a choice between two options, decision makers can often be divided into three segments: those who strongly prefer the first option, those who strongly prefer the second option, and those who might choose either option depending on the particular conditions ("Switchers"). In any reference state, such as the experimental control, most Switchers are likely to favor one of the two options. Thus, the limited growth potential of the option favored by Switchers in the reference state creates "effect propensity" in the opposite direction, whereby any condition or manipulation applied to the reference state is more likely to increase the share of the other option. We test this proposition in a series of studies in the context of choices between safe and risky options and between lower-price/quality and higher-price/quality options. The results indicate that a large majority of conceptually unrelated manipulations tend to increase the choice share of risky and higher-price/quality options. This effect propensity can be reversed when the risky and higher-price/quality options are the status quo alternatives or asymmetrically dominating in the reference state. Alternative explanations for effect propensity are examined. We discuss the implications of effect propensity for the interpretation of research findings, the selection of controls, and theory tests