Footnote:
In: Ethics and International Affairs, Vol. 30, No. 2 (2016), pp. 167-176
Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments April 12, 2016 erstellt
Description:
The simplicity of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) formed the basis of its apparent success and the grounds for relentless critique. It is fair to say that the new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) lurch in the opposite direction. After a unique exercise in global participatory democracy, world leaders have endorsed seemingly a dramatically ambitious social and environmental agenda. Constituted by a thick wad of seventeen goals and 169 targets, it stretches across a breath-taking array of global concerns, including many human rights. But is big so beautiful? Will the agenda wilt under its own ambitions? Did the lure of grand proclamation override the need for effective and focused global policy-making? And, has its breadth provided a convenient cover for problematic compromises and a conservative capture of the monitoring process? The answer to these questions is partly yes but the agenda’s ultimate success lies in its potency as a political resource