• Media type: E-Book
  • Title: Audit Partners’ Role in Material Misstatement Resolution : Survey and Interview Evidence
  • Contributor: Maksymov, Eldar [Author]; Peecher, Mark E. [Author]; Sutherland, Andrew [Author]; Weber, Joseph [Author]
  • Published: [S.l.]: SSRN, [2023]
  • Extent: 1 Online-Ressource (78 p)
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4459495
  • Identifier:
  • Keywords: Auditing ; Financial Reporting ; Material Misstatements ; Audit Quality
  • Origination:
  • Footnote: Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments June 22, 2023 erstellt
  • Description: Auditors are expected to identify and resolve material misstatements (MMs) in management’s financial statements. However, beyond the audit opinion, the audit process is opaque. To address this, we independently survey 462 audit partners and interview 24 audit partners, CFOs, and audit committee members on how partners assess and address MM risk, resolve MMs, and the consequences of MMs. Partners identify MMs in approximately 9% (15%) of public (private) engagements and use qualitative factors to waive some MMs. Loan covenant and going-concern issues increase MM risk more than earnings benchmark issues. Partners point to a variety of both auditor and client factors as threats to audit effectiveness. Partners often rely on rapport with management and involve the national office and audit committee in resolving MMs. Partner incentives around restatements are context-specific. Our results provide new insights into the auditor’s role in financial reporting that are relevant to academics, practitioners, and regulators
  • Access State: Open Access