Darvishi, Ali
[Author];
Daroudi, Rajabali
[Author];
Fazaeli, Ali Akbar
[Author]
Cost-utility analysis of Palbociclib + letrozole and ribociclib + letrozole versus Letrozole monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Iran using partitioned survival model
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Cost-utility analysis of Palbociclib + letrozole and ribociclib + letrozole versus Letrozole monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Iran using partitioned survival model
Description:
Background Palbociclib and Ribociclib are cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 oral molecular inhibitors that have the potential to improve overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to analyze the cost-utility of Palbociclib and Ribociclib in comparison with Letrozole monotherapy as the frst-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) MBC patients in Iran. Methods A Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA) was conducted using a partitioned survival model (PSM) from the perspective of the Iranian healthcare system. The comparative strategies considered were Palbociclib+Letrozole, Ribociclib+Letrozole, and Letrozole monotherapy. The model was structured with a 1-month cycle length and a 15-year time horizon. Clinical safety, efcacy, and survival data in terms of PFS and OS for Palbociclib+Letrozole and Ribociclib+Letrozole were obtained from the latest updates of the PALOMA-1, 2, and MONALEESA-2 studies, respectively. Direct medical costs, including drug costs, visits, hospitalization, CT scans, bone x-rays, monitoring and laboratory testing, as well as medication side efects, were considered. Uncertainty evaluations were performed through deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Excel 2016 and TreeAge 2020 were used for all stages of the evaluation. Results The base case results indicated that, despite its lower efectiveness, Letrozole monotherapy was the most cost-efective strategy, while Palbociclib+Letrozole and Ribociclib+Letrozole were not cost-efective. The incremental cost-efectiveness ratios (ICERs) for Palbociclib+Letrozole and Ribociclib+Letrozole compared to Letrozole monotherapy were estimated at $137,302 and $120,478 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), respectively, which exceeded the target threshold of $4565. Deterministic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the CUA results were not sensitive to changes in the values of uncertain variables. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis also indicated that Palbociclib+Letrozole and Ribociclib+Letrozole had no chance of being cost-efective based on changes in various parameters and simulations. Conclusions Palbociclib and Ribociclib showed signifcant efcacy in combination with Letrozole, as evidenced by improvements in PFS. However, in the frst-line treatment of MBC in Iran, these strategies were not cost-efective compared to Letrozole monotherapy