• Media type: Text; E-Article
  • Title: Test and Validation of the Surrogate-Based, Multi-Objective GOMORS Algorithm against the NSGA-II Algorithm in Structural Shape Optimization
  • Contributor: Werner, Yannis [Author]; van Hout, Tim [Author]; Raja Gopalan, Vijey Subramani [Author]; Vietor, Thomas [Author]
  • Published: MDPI, 2022-01-28
  • Published in: Algorithms : Special Issue "Nature-Inspired Algorithms in Machine Learning" 15 (2022) 2, 46. - https://doi.org/10.3390/a15020046 -- http://www.mdpi.com/journal/algorithms -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2455149 -- 1999-4893
  • Language: English
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/a15020046
  • Keywords: Publikationsfonds der TU Braunschweig ; Article ; multi-objective optimization -- NSGA-II -- GOMORS -- crash optimization -- structural optimization -- shape optimization -- engineering optimization ; Veröffentlichung der TU Braunschweig
  • Origination:
  • Footnote: Diese Datenquelle enthält auch Bestandsnachweise, die nicht zu einem Volltext führen.
  • Description: Nowadays, product development times are constantly decreasing, while the requirements for the products themselves increased significantly in the last decade. Hence, manufacturers use Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and Finite-Element (FE) Methods to develop better products in shorter times. Shape optimization offers great potential to improve many high-fidelity, numerical problems such as the crash performance of cars. Still, the proper selection of optimization algorithms provides a great potential to increase the speed of the optimization time. This article reviews the optimization performance of two different algorithms and frameworks for the structural behavior of a b-pillar. A b-pillar is the structural component between a car’s front and rear door, loaded under static and crash requirements. Furthermore, the validation of the algorithm includes a feasibility constraint. Recently, an optimization routine was implemented and validated for a Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) implementation. Different multi-objective optimization algorithms are reviewed and methodically ranked in a comparative study by given criteria. In this case, the Gap Optimized Multi-Objective Optimization using Response Surfaces (GOMORS) framework is chosen and implemented into the existing Institut für Konstruktionstechnik Optimizes Shapes (IKOS) framework. Specifically, the article compares the NSGA-II and GOMORS directly for a linear, non-linear, and feasibility optimization scenario. The results show that the GOMORS outperforms the NSGA-II vastly regarding the number of function calls and Pareto-efficient results without the feasibility constraint. The problem is reformulated to an unconstrained, three-objective optimization problem to analyze the influence of the constraint. The constrained and unconstrained approaches show equal performance for the given scenarios. Accordingly, the authors provide a clear recommendation towards the surrogate-based GOMORS for costly and multi-objective evaluations. Furthermore, the ...
  • Access State: Open Access
  • Rights information: Attribution (CC BY)