Shrimali, Gireesh
[Author];
Jenner, Steffen
[Author];
Groba, Felix
[Author];
Chan, Gabriel
[Author];
Indvik, Joe
[Author]
Have state renewable portfolio standards really worked? Synthesizing past policy assessments to build an integrated econometric analysis of RPS effectiveness in the US
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Book;
Report
Title:
Have state renewable portfolio standards really worked? Synthesizing past policy assessments to build an integrated econometric analysis of RPS effectiveness in the US
Contributor:
Shrimali, Gireesh
[Author];
Jenner, Steffen
[Author];
Groba, Felix
[Author];
Chan, Gabriel
[Author];
Indvik, Joe
[Author]
imprint:
Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), 2012
Footnote:
Diese Datenquelle enthält auch Bestandsnachweise, die nicht zu einem Volltext führen.
Description:
Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are the most popular U.S. state-level policies for promoting deployment of renewable electricity (RES-E). While several econometric studies have estimated the effect of RPS on in-state RES-E deployment, results are contradictory. We reconcile these studies and move toward a definitive answer to the question of RPS effectiveness. We conduct an analysis using time series cross sectional regressions - including the most nuanced controls for policy design features to date - and nonparametric matching analysis. We find that higher RPS stringency does not necessarily drive more RES-E deployment. We examine several RPS design features and market characteristics (including REC unbundling, RPS in neighboring states, out-of-state renewable energy purchases) that may explain the gap between effective and ineffective policies. We also investigate other RES-E policies and technology-specific effects. Ultimately, we show that RPS effectiveness is largely explained by a combination of policy design, market context, and inter-state trading effects.