> Details

Stahl, Jutta [Author]; Mattes, André [Author]; Hundrieser, Manuela [Author]; Kummer, Kilian [Author]; Mück, Markus [Author]; Niessen, Eva [Author]; Porth, Elisa [Author]; Siswandari, Yohana [Author]; Wolters, Peter [Author]; Dummel, Sebastian [Author]

Neural correlates of error detection during complex response selection: Introduction of a novel eight-alternative response task

Reference
management

Bookmarks

Remove from
bookmarks

Share this on Whatsapp

Close

Bookmarks



You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
  • Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Neural correlates of error detection during complex response selection: Introduction of a novel eight-alternative response task
  • Contributor: Stahl, Jutta [Author]; Mattes, André [Author]; Hundrieser, Manuela [Author]; Kummer, Kilian [Author]; Mück, Markus [Author]; Niessen, Eva [Author]; Porth, Elisa [Author]; Siswandari, Yohana [Author]; Wolters, Peter [Author]; Dummel, Sebastian [Author]
  • Published: Elsevier Science, 2020
  • Published in: Biological psychology 156, 107969 - (2020). doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107969
  • Language: English
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107969
  • ISSN: 0301-0511; 1873-6246
  • Origination:
  • Footnote: Diese Datenquelle enthält auch Bestandsnachweise, die nicht zu einem Volltext führen.
  • Description: Error processing in complex decision tasks should be more difficult compared to a simple and commonly used two-choice task. We developed an eight-alternative response task (8ART), which allowed us to investigate different aspects of error detection. We analysed event-related potentials (ERP; N = 30). Interestingly, the response time moderated several findings. For example, only for fast responses, we observed the well-known effect of larger error negativity (Ne) in signalled and non-signalled errors compared to correct responses, but not for slow responses. We identified at least two different error sources due to post-experimental reports and certainty ratings: impulsive (fast) errors and (slow) memory errors. Interestingly, the participants were able to perform the task and to identify both, impulsive and memory errors successfully. Preliminary evidence indicated that early (Ne-related) error processing was not sensitive to memory errors but to impulsive errors, whereas the error positivity seemed to be sensitive to both error types.
  • Access State: Open Access