• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Cost-effectiveness of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T systematic screening strategy compared with usual care to identify patients with peri-operative myocardial injury after major noncardiac surgery
  • Contributor: Popova, Ekaterine; Alonso-Coello, Pablo; Álvarez-García, Jesús; Paniagua-Iglesias, Pilar; Rué-Monné, Montserrat; Vives-Borrás, Miguel; Font-Gual, Adria; Gich-Saladich, Ignasi; Martínez-Bru, Cecilia; Ordóñez-Llanos, Jordi; Carles-Lavila, Misericordia
  • imprint: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2023
  • Published in: European Journal of Anaesthesiology
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001793
  • ISSN: 0265-0215; 1365-2346
  • Keywords: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:sec> <jats:title>BACKGROUND</jats:title> <jats:p>About 300 million surgeries are performed worldwide annually and this figure is increasing constantly. Peri-operative myocardial injury (PMI), detected by cardiac troponin (cTn) elevation, is a common cardiac complication of noncardiac surgery, strongly associated with short- and long-term mortality. Without systematic peri-operative cTn screening, most cases of PMI may go undetected. However, little is known about cost effectiveness of a systematic PMI screening strategy with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) after noncardiac surgery.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>OBJECTIVE</jats:title> <jats:p>To assess, in patients with high cardiovascular risk, the cost-effectiveness of a systematic screening strategy using a hs-cTnT assay, to identify patients with PMI after major noncardiac surgery, compared with usual care.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>DESIGN</jats:title> <jats:p>Cost-effectiveness analysis; single centre prospective cohort study.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>SETTING</jats:title> <jats:p>Spanish University Hospital.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>PATIENTS</jats:title> <jats:p>From July 2016 to March 2019, we included 1477 consecutive surgical patients aged ≥65 or if &lt;65, with documented history of cardiovascular disease or impaired renal function, who underwent major noncardiac surgery and required at least an overnight hospital stay. We excluded patients aged &lt;65 years without cardiovascular disease, undergoing minor surgery, or with an expected &lt;24 h hospital stays.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>INTERVENTIONS</jats:title> <jats:p>We conducted a decision-tree analysis, comparing a systematic screening strategy measuring hs-cTnT before surgery, and at the 2nd and 3rd days after surgery vs. a usual care strategy. We considered a third-party payer perspective and the outcomes of both strategies in the short-term (30 days follow-up). Information about costs was expressed in Euros-2021. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the systematic hs-cTnT strategy, defined as the expected cost per any additional PMI detected, and explored the robustness of the model using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES</jats:title> <jats:p>ICER of the systematic hs-cTnT screening strategy.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title> <jats:p>The ICER was €425 per any additionally detected PMI. The deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that a 15% variation in costs, and a 1% variation in the predictive values, had a minor impact over the ICER, except in case of the negative predictive value of the systematic hs-cTnT screening strategy. Monte Carlo simulations (probabilistic sensitivity analysis) showed that systematic hs-cTnT screening would be cost-effective in 100% of cases with a ‘willingness to pay’ of €780.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS</jats:title> <jats:p>Our results suggest that systematic peri-operative PMI screening with hs-cTnT may be cost-effective in the short-term in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Economic evaluations, with a long-term horizon, are still needed.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION</jats:title> <jats:p>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03438448.</jats:p> </jats:sec>