• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Repeatability and Intersession Reproducibility of Pentacam Corneal Thickness Maps in Fuchs Dystrophy and Endothelial Keratoplasty
  • Contributor: Mingo-Botín, David; Arnalich-Montiel, Francisco; Couceiro de Juan, Ana; Ortiz-Toquero, Sara
  • imprint: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2018
  • Published in: Cornea
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000001634
  • ISSN: 0277-3740
  • Keywords: Ophthalmology
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose:</jats:title> <jats:p>To assess intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility of Pentacam corneal thickness maps in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) before and after endothelial transplantation.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods:</jats:title> <jats:p>In this observational diagnostic evaluation, 20 healthy subjects along with 81 consecutive patients were examined. Patients were classified into 4 groups: FECD without corneal edema, FECD with corneal edema, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Three consecutive scans of each eye were obtained at 2 different sessions. Raw pachymetry data were used to calculate average values of 4 concentric annular zones, which were also divided into 8 sectors. Repeatability and reproducibility coefficients (CR), coefficient of variation (CV), intraclass correlation coefficient, and 95% limits of agreement were calculated.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results:</jats:title> <jats:p>The intrasession repeatability CV was ≤1% in the central 6 mm for all groups, with an intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.97. It was better at the central zone than the periphery in all groups. Intersession reproducibility tended to be worse in the central area than the periphery in FECD without edema (CR ≤ 24.37; CV ≤ 1.48) and FECD with edema (CR ≤ 36.74; CV ≤ 2.03), whereas it was better in the central area in healthy eyes (CR ≤ 20.11; CV ≤ 1.32) and improved after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (CR ≤ 21.93; CV ≤ 1.31) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (CR ≤ 30.83; CV ≤ 1.94).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title> <jats:p>Pentacam corneal thickness maps showed good repeatability and intersession reproducibility in virgin and grafted corneas with FECD, which makes it a valid tool for monitoring these patients. Central areas showed the highest variability between sessions in diseased groups.</jats:p> </jats:sec>