• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Influence of Floating-Mass Transducer Coupling Efficiency for Active Middle-Ear Implants on Speech Recognition
  • Contributor: Müller, Alexander; Mir-Salim, Parwis; Zellhuber, Nina; Helbig, Ralf; Bloching, Marc; Schmidt, Tobias; Koscielny, Sven; Dziemba, Oliver C.; Plontke, Stefan K.; Rahne, Torsten
  • imprint: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2017
  • Published in: Otology & Neurotology
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001412
  • ISSN: 1531-7129; 1537-4505
  • Keywords: Neurology (clinical) ; Sensory Systems ; Otorhinolaryngology
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:sec> <jats:title>Objective:</jats:title> <jats:p>The efficiency of vibroplasty (coupler-floating mass transducer [FMT] assembly) can be monitored by direct stimulation of the inner ear through the active middle-ear implant system and comparison of the vibroplasty in vivo threshold and the postoperative bone-conduction pure-tone threshold. The aim of this study was to compare the vibroplasty in vivo threshold with the postoperative speech recognition in patients with a high preoperative maximum word recognition score.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Study Design:</jats:title> <jats:p>Retrospective cohort study of German-speaking patients implanted with a vibrating ossicular prosthesis (VORP) 502 or VORP 503 and high preoperative maximum word recognition score between the years of 2011 and 2015.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Setting:</jats:title> <jats:p>Multicenter study of four German centers.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Patients:</jats:title> <jats:p>Twenty-three active middle-ear implant users.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Intervention:</jats:title> <jats:p>Rehabilitative.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Main Outcome Measures:</jats:title> <jats:p>Bone-conduction pure-tone and vibroplasty thresholds, postoperative aided word recognition score (WRS) at 65 dB SPL (sound pressure level) and preoperative maximum WRS with Freiburg monosyllabic words.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results:</jats:title> <jats:p>The mean postoperative aided WRS at 65 dB SPL was 82%. An increasing difference between vibroplasty thresholds and bone-conduction thresholds was associated with a higher discrepancy between the unaided maximum WRS and the postoperative aided WRS. Only if this difference was less than 20 dB, an articulation index of 0.5 (WRS = 75%) or more was achieved.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title> <jats:p>Audiological outcome after vibroplasty depends on the coupling efficiency reflected by the vibroplasty threshold.</jats:p> </jats:sec>