Description:
<jats:sec id="ab-aoi230089-4"><jats:title>Importance</jats:title><jats:p>Medicare Advantage (MA) has grown in popularity, but critics believe that insurers are overpaid, partially due to the quartile adjustment system that determines plan benchmarks. However, elimination of the quartile adjustments may be associated with less generous benefits and fewer plan offerings, which could slow MA enrollment growth.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-aoi230089-5"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To examine whether the quartile adjustment system is associated with differences in county-level benefits, insurer offerings, and MA enrollment.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-aoi230089-6"><jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants</jats:title><jats:p>The quartile adjustments create discontinuous jumps in county-level base payments based on historical traditional Medicare spending. Data from January 2017 to December 2021 and a regression discontinuity design were used to examine changes in insurer behavior and MA enrollment between quartiles. The analytic sample included 1557 county observations.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-aoi230089-7"><jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures</jats:title><jats:p>Study outcomes included monthly premiums, the share of plans charging premiums, primary care copayments, the share of plans using rebates to reduce Part B premiums, supplemental benefits, plan and contract availability, and MA enrollment.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-aoi230089-8"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Discontinuities were found in the quartile adjustments and benchmarks. A 1–percentage point (pp) increase in the quartile adjustment was associated with a $6.36 increase in monthly benchmarks (95% CI, 5.10-7.62), a $0.51 decrease in monthly premiums (95% CI, −0.96 to −0.07), and a 0.68 pp decrease in the share of plans charging premiums (95% CI, −1.25 to −0.10). Significant changes were not found in primary care copayments (-$0.04; 95% CI, −0.17 to 0.09), the share of plans using rebates to reduce Part B premiums (−0.17 pp; 95% CI, −0.34 to 0.01), supplemental benefits (eg, preventive dental coverage; 0.17 pp; 95% CI, −0.25 to 0.0), the number of plans (1.06; 95% CI, −3.44 to 5.57) or contracts (0.31; 95% CI, −0.18 to 0.81), or the MA enrollment rate (0.16 pp; 95% CI, −0.61 to 0.94).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-aoi230089-9"><jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance</jats:title><jats:p>The study results suggest that MA plans are not very sensitive to modest changes in payment rates. Modifications to the quartile adjustment system may generate savings without substantially affecting MA beneficiaries.</jats:p></jats:sec>