• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Predictors and outcomes of fluctuations in the clinical dementia rating scale
  • Contributor: Wilks, Hannah; Benzinger, Tammie L. S.; Schindler, Suzanne E.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Morris, John C.; Hassenstab, Jason
  • imprint: Wiley, 2024
  • Published in: Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1002/alz.13679
  • ISSN: 1552-5260; 1552-5279
  • Keywords: Psychiatry and Mental health ; Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ; Geriatrics and Gerontology ; Neurology (clinical) ; Developmental Neuroscience ; Health Policy ; Epidemiology
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>INTRODUCTION</jats:title><jats:p>Reversion, or change in cognitive status from impaired to normal, is common in aging and dementia studies, but it remains unclear what factors predict reversion.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>METHODS</jats:title><jats:p>We investigated whether reverters, defined as those who revert from a Clinical Dementia Rating® (CDR®) scale score of 0.5 to CDR 0) differed on cognition and biomarkers from unimpaired participants (always CDR 0) and impaired participants (converted to CDR &gt; 0 and had no reversion events). Models evaluated relationships between biomarker status, <jats:italic>apolipoprotein E (APOE)</jats:italic> ε4 status, and cognition. Additional models described predictors of reversion and predictors of eventual progression to CDR &gt; 0.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title><jats:p>CDR reversion was associated with younger age, better cognition, and negative amyloid biomarker status. Reverters that eventually progressed to CDR &gt; 0 had more visits, were older, and were more likely to have an <jats:italic>APOE ε</jats:italic>4 allele.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>DISCUSSION</jats:title><jats:p>CDR reversion occupies a transitional phase in disease progression between cognitive normality and overt dementia. Reverters may be ideal candidates for secondary prevention Alzheimer's disease (AD) trials.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Highlights</jats:title><jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Reverters had more longitudinal cognitive decline than those who remained cognitively normal.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Predictors of reversion: younger age, better cognition, and negative amyloid biomarker status.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Reverting from CDR 0.5 to 0 is a risk factor for future conversion to CDR &gt; 0.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>CDR reversion may be a transitional phase in Alzheimer's Disease progression.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>CDR reverters may be ideal for Alzheimer's disease secondary prevention trials.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p></jats:sec>
  • Access State: Open Access