Description:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>This multicentre study investigated the association of periprocedural changes in the levels of N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) with clinical outcomes after transcatheter edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair (TMVR).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods and results</jats:title><jats:p>Patients were retrospectively analysed who underwent TMVR with the MitraClip system (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and had available sequential NT‐proBNP testing at baseline and 2 months after TMVR. Periprocedural changes in NT‐proBNP following TMVR were assessed as the percent change in NT‐proBNP between baseline and the 2 month follow‐up, and the significant reduction in NT‐proBNP was defined as a decrease of >30% in the follow‐up NT‐proBNP compared with the pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP level. Primary outcome was defined as a composite outcome consisting of all‐cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure from 2 months to 2 years after TMVR. Additionally, we identified the cut‐off value of pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP to predict the composite outcome using a receiver operating characteristic analysis (cut‐off: 2485 pg/mL). Of 485 patients undergoing TMVR (age: 76.2 ± 9.2 years, female: 42.1%, secondary mitral regurgitation: 67.2%), 150 patients (30.9%) had the significant reduction in NT‐proBNP (>30%) following the procedure. Patients with the NT‐proBNP reduction had a lower incidence of the composite outcome, compared with those without the reduction in NT‐proBNP (31.4% vs. 40.2%; log‐rank <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.03). The significant reduction in NT‐proBNP was also associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–0.97; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.04], independently of pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP levels and other clinical parameters. The percent change in NT‐proBNP was associated with a linear trend of the incidence of the composite outcome (adjusted HR per 10% decrease: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94–0.98; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.001). A stratified analysis revealed that the prognostic impact of the significant reduction in NT‐proBNP was consistent among clinical subgroups, including aetiology of mitral regurgitation (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> for interaction = 0.99). Higher pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP level (>2485 pg/mL) was associated with the increased risk of the composite outcome (adjusted HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.03–2.17; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.03); however, patients with a higher pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP who achieved the significant reduction in NT‐proBNP had a similar risk of the composite outcome to those with a lower pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Changes in sequential NT‐proBNP measurements were associated with clinical outcomes within 2 years after TMVR. The assessment of NT‐proBNP dynamics may be valuable to assess the residual risk for patients undergoing TMVR and could assist with post‐procedural management after TMVR.</jats:p></jats:sec>