• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: The impact of different warm‐up strategies on acceleration and deceleration demands in highly trained soccer players
  • Contributor: Silva, Hugo; Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo; Bajanca, Catarina; Pinho, Gonçalo; Loturco, Irineu; Marcelino, Rui
  • imprint: Wiley, 2024
  • Published in: European Journal of Sport Science
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12036
  • ISSN: 1746-1391; 1536-7290
  • Keywords: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ; Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ; General Medicine
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This study compared the differences in acceleration and deceleration demands between three different warm‐up (WU) strategies (<jats:italic>Reaction speed</jats:italic> [exercises with reaction to a stimulus], <jats:italic>Run</jats:italic> [self‐paced running], and <jats:italic>Speed</jats:italic> [exercises such as shuttle running or circuits]) applied to highly trained soccer players. Nineteen players were monitored for 4 weeks using a 10 Hz Global Positioning System. Accelerations and decelerations magnitudes were classified as low (25%–50%), moderate (50%–75%), and high (&gt;75%) intensities. Additionally, efforts were analyzed according to their respective starting speeds (&lt;5, 5–10, 10–15, 15–20, 20–25, and &gt;25 km h<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Differences between WU strategies were estimated via paired mean differences along with effect sizes. The three WU strategies led to few efforts starting &gt;15 km h<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and high‐intensity efforts (&lt;1 effort per minute). Players performed more high‐intensity accelerations during <jats:italic>Speed</jats:italic> than <jats:italic>Reaction Speed</jats:italic> (ES: 0.74 [90% CI: 0.21, 1.33]); more moderate‐intensity accelerations during <jats:italic>Reaction Speed</jats:italic> than <jats:italic>Run</jats:italic> (ES: 1.29 [90% CI: 0.72, 2.00]); more moderate‐intensity decelerations during <jats:italic>Reaction Speed</jats:italic> than <jats:italic>Run</jats:italic> (ES: 0.64 [90% CI: 0.04, 1.32]) and <jats:italic>Speed</jats:italic> (ES: 0.89 [90% CI: 0.37, 1.50]); more decelerations started at 20–25 km h<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> during <jats:italic>Speed</jats:italic> than <jats:italic>Reaction Speed</jats:italic> (ES: 0.81 [90% CI: 0.20, 1.49]) and <jats:italic>Run</jats:italic> (ES: 0.76 [90% CI: 0.42, 1.18]); and more decelerations started at &gt;25 km h<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> during Speed than <jats:italic>Reaction Speed</jats:italic> (ES: 3.57 [90% CI: 2.88, 4.58]). In conclusion, <jats:italic>Speed</jats:italic> elicited higher acceleration and deceleration demands than the <jats:italic>Reaction Speed</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Run</jats:italic> WU strategies, and this should be considered when designing training sessions.</jats:p>
  • Access State: Open Access