Weiss, Jakob B. W.;
Spuerck, Felicitas;
Kollar, Branislav;
Eisenhardt, Steffen U.
Age‐related outcome of facial reanimation surgery using cross face nerve graft and gracilis free functional muscle transfer—A retrospective cohort study
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Age‐related outcome of facial reanimation surgery using cross face nerve graft and gracilis free functional muscle transfer—A retrospective cohort study
Contributor:
Weiss, Jakob B. W.;
Spuerck, Felicitas;
Kollar, Branislav;
Eisenhardt, Steffen U.
Published:
Wiley, 2022
Published in:
Microsurgery, 42 (2022) 6, Seite 557-567
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1002/micr.30896
ISSN:
0738-1085;
1098-2752
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
AbstractBackgroundFree functional muscle transfer has become the criterion standard for the treatment of long‐standing flaccid facial paralysis. Clinical experience suggests that a two‐stage approach using a cross‐face nerve graft (CFNG) as a donor nerve for free functional muscle transfers (FFMT) is less successful in older patients when compared to the pediatric population. However, clear data and scientific evidence are still rare. This study examines the age‐related outcome of CFNG‐driven FFMT.MethodsTwenty‐eight patients with a mean age of 20.73 years (ranging 5–51 years) who received two‐stage facial reanimation with CFNG‐driven gracilis FFMT at our institution from 1998 to 2019 were included. The ipsilateral sural nerve was used as CFNG. After 12 months, the ipsilateral gracilis muscle was used as FFMT. Patients were distributed equally into three cohorts according to their age. We assessed facial symmetry before and after facial reanimation measuring the angle between the interpupillary and the intermodiolar line (pupillo‐modiolar angle). Additionally, the commissure height was measured using the Emotrics software.ResultsThe mean follow‐up of the pediatric, young adults and the middle‐aged cohort was 29.5 ± 7.3, 24.9 ± 6.3, and 25.5 ± 12.4 months, respectively. One patient suffered flap loss due to flap ischemia. Four patients suffered insufficient innervation of the FFMT. Otherwise no major complication occurred. The likelihood of successful innervation of the FFMT was significantly higher in patients younger than 31 years (100% vs. 50%; p = .003). Smiling facial symmetry (pupillo‐modiolar angle) significantly improved in the pediatric cohort (5–16 years; 8.68° ± 0.69° to 1.48° ± 0.67°; p < .001) and the young adults' cohort (17–30 years; 11.55° ± 1.95° to 4.62° ± 1.08°; p = .005), but improved only slightly in the middle‐aged cohort (31–51 years; 11.77° ± 1.16° to 9.4° ± 1.8° p = .27). The postoperative smiling symmetry showed a significant correlation with increasing age (r = .62, p < .001). The smiling commissure height deviation significantly improved in the pediatric cohort (5–16 years; 6.5–2.3 mm; p = .006) and the postoperative result was significantly better than the middle‐aged group (31–51 years; 2.3 vs. 7.5 mm; p = .02).ConclusionsThe outcome of CFNG‐driven gracilis FFMT is age‐related. Static as well as dynamic facial symmetry after two‐stage facial reanimation was best in the pediatric and young adult population. For older patients, other approaches like the nerve‐to‐masseter‐driven FFMT should be considered.