> Details

Schmidt, Wolf U.; Lutz, M.; Ploner, C. J.; Braun, M.

The diagnostic value of the neurological examination in coma of unknown etiology

Reference
management

Bookmarks

Remove from
bookmarks

Share this on Whatsapp

Close

Bookmarks



You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
  • Media type: E-Article
  • Title: The diagnostic value of the neurological examination in coma of unknown etiology
  • Contributor: Schmidt, Wolf U.; Lutz, M.; Ploner, C. J.; Braun, M.
  • Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021
  • Published in: Journal of Neurology, 268 (2021) 10, Seite 3826-3834
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10527-4
  • ISSN: 0340-5354; 1432-1459
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: AbstractBackgroundIdentifying the cause of non-traumatic coma in the emergency department is challenging. The clinical neurological examination is the most readily available tool to detect focal neurological deficits as indicators for cerebral causes of coma. Previously proposed clinical pathways have granted the interpretation of clinical findings a pivotal role in the diagnostic work-up. We aimed to identify the actual diagnostic reliability of the neurological examination with regard to identifying acute brain damage.MethodsEight hundred and fifty-three patients with coma of unknown etiology (CUE) were examined neurologically in the emergency department following a predefined routine. Coma-explaining pathologies were identified retrospectively and grouped into primary brain pathology with proof of acute brain damage and other causes without proof of acute structural pathology. Sensitivity, specificity and percentage of correct predictions of different examination protocols were calculated using contingency tables and binary logistic regression models.ResultsThe full neurological examination was 74% sensitive and 60% specific to detect acute structural brain damage underlying CUE. Sensitivity and specificity were higher in non-sedated patients (87/61%) compared to sedated patients (64%/59%). A shortened four-item examination protocol focusing on pupils, gaze and pyramidal tract signs was only slightly less sensitive (67%) and more specific (65%).ConclusionsDue to limited diagnostic reliability of the physical examination, the absence of focal neurological signs in acutely comatose patients should not defer from a complete work-up including brain imaging. In an emergency, a concise neurological examination should thus serve as one part of a multimodal diagnostic approach to CUE.