• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: The power of social norms: Why conceptual engineers should care about implementation
  • Contributor: Nimtz, Christian
  • Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2024
  • Published in: Synthese, 203 (2024) 6
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11229-024-04625-9
  • ISSN: 1573-0964
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: AbstractJennifer Nado has recently argued that conceptual engineers should focus on (re-)designing representations and may safely ignore issues of implementation. I make a general case for the methodological importance of implementation to conceptual engineering. Using the Social Norms Account as a foil, I argue for three claims. (1) Inquiring into methods of implementation is a theoretically challenging and philosophically worthwhile project in and of itself. (2) A sound theoretical understanding of implementation is imperative for theorists of conceptual engineering. It proves vital for their assessment of the prospects for engineering interventions and the political risks inherent in them. (3) A sound theoretical understanding of implementation is imperative for practitioners of conceptual engineering. The usefulness of their representational (re-)designs depends on respecting broadly cognitive and social constraints on the part of the target population. I conclude that conceptual engineers have very good reasons to seriously engage with issues of implementation.