• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Speech, Harm, and the Mind-Body Problem in First Amendment Jurisprudence
  • Contributor: Brison, Susan J.
  • imprint: Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1998
  • Published in: Legal Theory
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1017/s1352325200000914
  • ISSN: 1352-3252; 1469-8048
  • Keywords: Law ; Philosophy
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:p>“Sucks and stones will break my bones,” Justice Scalia pronounced from the bench in oral arguments in<jats:italic>Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network</jats:italic>, “but words can never hurt me. That's the First Amendment,” he added. Jay Alan Sekulow, the lawyer for the petitioners, anti-abortion protesters who had been enjoined from moving closer than fifteen feet away from those entering an abortion facility, was obviously pleased by this characterization of the right to free speech, replying, “That's certainly our position on it, and that is exactly correct …”</jats:p>