You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Associations between frequency of food shopping at different store types and diet and weight outcomes: findings from the NEWPATH study
Contributor:
Minaker, Leia M;
Olstad, Dana L;
Thompson, Mary E;
Raine, Kim D;
Fisher, Pat;
Frank, Lawrence D
Published:
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016
Published in:
Public Health Nutrition, 19 (2016) 12, Seite 2268-2277
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1017/s1368980016000355
ISSN:
1368-9800;
1475-2727
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
AbstractObjectiveThe present study aimed to: (i) examine associations between food store patronage and diet and weight-related outcomes; and (ii) explore consumer motivations for visiting different types of food store.DesignA stratified probability sample of residents completed household and individual-level surveys in 2009/2010 on food purchasing patterns and motivations, dietary intake, waist circumference (WC), weight and height. Diet quality was calculated using the Healthy Eating Index for Canada from a subset of participants (n 1362). Generalized estimating equations were created in 2015 to examine how frequency of patronizing different types of food store was associated with diet quality, intake of fruits and vegetable, mean intake of energy (kcal) sodium and saturated fat, WC and BMI.SettingThree mid-sized urban municipalities in Ontario, Canada.SubjectsA representative sample of residents (n 4574).ResultsParticipants who shopped frequently at food co-ops had significantly better diet quality (β=5·3; 99 % CI 0·3, 10·2) than those who did not. BMI and WC were significantly lower among those who frequently shopped at specialty shops (BMI, β=−2·1; 99 % CI −3·0, −1·1; WC, β=−4·8; 99 % CI −7·0, −2·5) and farmers’ markets (BMI, β=−1·4; 99 % CI −2·3, −0·5; WC, β=−3·8; 99 % CI −6·0, −1·6) compared with those who did not. Relative importance of reasons for food outlet selection differed by large (price, food quality) v. small (proximity, convenient hours) shopping trip and by outlet type.ConclusionsFindings contribute to our understanding of food store selection and have implications for potentially relevant retail food intervention settings.