• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Psychometric validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale in Polish (IPOS-Pol)
  • Contributor: Szeliga, Marta; Kotlińska-Lemieszek, Aleksandra; Jagielski, Paweł; Jaroszewski, Wojciech; Kuźmicz, Ilona; Stachnik, Katarzyna; Feit, Julia; Deskur-Śmielecka, Ewa; Gradalski, Tomasz
  • imprint: Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2021
  • Published in: Palliative and Supportive Care
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1017/s1478951521001176
  • ISSN: 1478-9515; 1478-9523
  • Keywords: Psychiatry and Mental health ; Clinical Psychology ; General Medicine ; General Nursing
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec id="S1478951521001176_sec_a1"> <jats:title>Objective</jats:title> <jats:p>The study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the IPOS-Pol for patient self-reporting.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S1478951521001176_sec_a2" sec-type="methods"> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>Patients (&gt;18 years of age) with advanced cancer admitted to three palliative care centers (inpatient units and home-based) were recruited to a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational, prospective study. Participants provided responses to the IPOS-Pol Patient version and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire – Core 15 – Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) Polish version at baseline (T1) and four to seven days later (T2). We assessed test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the tool.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S1478951521001176_sec_a3" sec-type="results"> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>One hundred and eighty patients were included. Test–retest reliability demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the average outcomes of the IPOS-Pol between T1 and T2 (27.2 ± 9.2 vs. 26.5 ± 8.7; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; 0.05). The intra-class correlation coefficient between T1 and T2 was <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.83 (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001), the intra-class correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability of the IPOS-Pol items ranged from 0.63 to 0.84 (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001), and the Cronbach's <jats:italic>α</jats:italic> coefficient for internal consistency was 0.773. The correlation coefficient between the IPOS-Pol and EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL total score was 0.79 (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S1478951521001176_sec_a4"> <jats:title>Significance of results</jats:title> <jats:p>The patient version of the Polish adaptation of IPOS is a valid and reliable outcome measure for assessing symptoms and concerns of individuals receiving palliative care, as well as the quality of care provided.</jats:p> </jats:sec>