You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Crisis and Gender in Legislative-Executive Relations
Contributor:
Kroeber, Corinna;
Dingler, Sarah C.
Published:
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2023
Published in:
Politics & Gender, 19 (2023) 3, Seite 908-914
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1017/s1743923x2200040x
ISSN:
1743-9248;
1743-923X
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
The interaction of the legislative and executive is gendered in nature. Gender shapes what actors in these two institutions demand from each other. This pattern is visible, for instance, in the distinct policy priorities of women and men in parliament (e.g., Allen and Childs 2019; Bäck and Debus 2019; Lowande, Ritchie, and Lauterbach 2019) and in the ways that women engage and oversee related government initiatives. At the same time, gender influences the strengths and weaknesses that actors in the legislature and executive ascribe to each other and, hence, their mutual assessment. Members of parliament (MPs) and party gatekeepers, for instance, tend to favor men for the most influential and well-resourced portfolios, since they believe that masculine traits are necessary or suitable to succeed in governmental positions, and membership in men-dominated political networks remains an important route to qualify for ministerial office (see, e.g., Annesley, Beckwith, and Franceschet 2019; Krook and O’Brien 2012). Change in these dynamics is scarce or occurs only gradually, meaning that the ways in which executive-legislative interactions are gendered are usually stable.