Planet, W. G.;
Miller, A. J.;
Horvath, K.;
Nagatani, R.;
Flynn, L. E.;
Hilsenrath, E.;
Kondragunta, S.;
Cebula, R. P.;
DeLand, M. T.
Total ozone determinations from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration operational solar backscattered ultraviolet 2 instrument observations: An update
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Total ozone determinations from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration operational solar backscattered ultraviolet 2 instrument observations: An update
Contributor:
Planet, W. G.;
Miller, A. J.;
Horvath, K.;
Nagatani, R.;
Flynn, L. E.;
Hilsenrath, E.;
Kondragunta, S.;
Cebula, R. P.;
DeLand, M. T.
imprint:
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2001
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Description:
<jats:p>Total ozone amounts have been derived from observations of the Solar Backscattered Ultraviolet 2 (SBUV/2) instruments on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) operational satellites since 1985. The data from the NOAA‐9 instrument for the period 1985–1997 have been reprocessed using instrument characterizations based on in‐orbit operation and comparisons with Shuttle Solar Backscattered Ultraviolet (SSBUV) observations. The data from the NOAA‐11 satellite for the period 1989–1994 have also been reprocessed using mainly internal spacecraft information. The data from the NOAA‐14 satellite for the period 1995–1998 have been reprocessed using complete instrument characterization. The NOAA‐11 and NOAA‐14 data for 1998 to the present, briefly discussed herein, are preliminary. The calibration adjustments used in the reprocessing of NOAA‐9, NOAA‐11, and NOAA‐14 total ozone data are internal, with the exception of those derived from SSBUV analysis, and are independent of Dobson and Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) total ozone measurements. The reprocessed data have been validated with ground‐based Dobson spectrophotometer observations, and are compared to other sources of total column ozone amounts. The mean bias between NOAA‐9 data and Dobson data is 1.9%±0.6% over the 12‐year record with a trend of 0.1% per year. The mean bias between NOAA‐11 and Dobson data is 0.8%±0.2% with a near‐zero trend. The mean bias between NOAA‐14 and Dobson data is 1.5%±0.3% with a trend of 0.2% per year; the NOAA‐14 calibration and characterization data for the period 1998 to the present are not yet fully analyzed. The methods used in the validations are discussed here, as are some reasons for the results. Finally, a recommendation is made for the use of a relatively continuous total ozone data set.</jats:p>