Description:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Current lightning predictions are uncertain because they rely on empirical diagnostic relationships and often use coarse‐scale climate scenario simulations in which deep convection is parameterized. Previous studies demonstrated that simulations with convection‐permitting resolutions improve lightning predictions compared to coarser‐grid simulations using convection parameterizations for different geographical locations but not over the boreal zone. In this study, lightning simulations with the NASA Unified‐Weather Research and Forecasting model are evaluated over a domain including the Great Slave Lake in Canada, for six lightning seasons. The simulations are performed at convection‐parameterized (9 km) and convection‐permitting (3 km) resolution using the Goddard 4ICE and the Thompson microphysics schemes. Four lightning indices are evaluated against observations from the Canadian Lightning Detection Network, in terms of spatiotemporal frequency distribution, spatial pattern, daily climatology, and an event‐based overall skill assessment. The Thompson scheme is, regardless of the spatial resolution, superior to the Goddard 4ICE scheme in predicting daily climatology but worse in predicting the spatial patterns of lightning occurrence. Results indicate that lightning estimation benefits from modeling at convection‐permitting resolution, in particular for the ice‐based lightning indices. In contrast, the product of convective available potential energy and precipitation rate proved to be the most robust index that was largely invariant to varying spatial resolution. Finally, this study reveals issues of the models to reproduce the observed spatial pattern of lightning well, which might be related to an insufficient representation of land surface heterogeneity, including peatlands, in the study area.</jats:p>