> Details
Abdelal, Qasem;
Assaf, Mohammed N.;
Al-Rawabdeh, Abdulla;
Arabasi, Sameer;
Rawashdeh, Nathir A.
Assessment of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 OLI for Small-Scale Inland Water Quality Modeling and Monitoring Based on Handheld Hyperspectral Ground Truthing
Sharing
Reference
management
Direct link
Bookmarks
Remove from
bookmarks
Share this by email
Share this on Twitter
Share this on Facebook
Share this on Whatsapp
- Media type: E-Article
- Title: Assessment of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 OLI for Small-Scale Inland Water Quality Modeling and Monitoring Based on Handheld Hyperspectral Ground Truthing
- Contributor: Abdelal, Qasem; Assaf, Mohammed N.; Al-Rawabdeh, Abdulla; Arabasi, Sameer; Rawashdeh, Nathir A.
-
Published:
Hindawi Limited, 2022
- Published in: Journal of Sensors, 2022 (2022), Seite 1-19
- Language: English
- DOI: 10.1155/2022/4643924
- ISSN: 1687-725X; 1687-7268
- Origination:
- Footnote:
- Description: <jats:p>This study investigates the best available methods for remote monitoring inland small-scale waterbodies, using remote sensing data from both Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 satellites, utilizing a handheld hyperspectral device for ground truthing. Monitoring was conducted to evaluate water quality indicators: chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM), and turbidity. Ground truthing was performed to select the most suitable atmospheric correction technique (ACT). Several ACT have been tested: dark spectrum fitting (DSF), dark object subtraction (DOS), atmospheric and topographic correction (ATCOR), and exponential extrapolation (EXP). Classical sampling was conducted first; then, the resulting concentrations were compared to those obtained using remote sensing analysis by the above-mentioned ACT. This research revealed that DOS and DSF achieved the best performance (an advantage ranging between 29% and 47%). Further, we demonstrated the appropriateness of the use of Sentinel-2 red and vegetation red edge reciprocal bands <jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <mfenced open="(" close=")"> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mfenced open="(" close=")"> <mrow> <mtext>B</mtext> <mn>4</mn> <mo>×</mo> <mtext>B</mtext> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </mfenced> </math> </jats:inline-formula> for estimating Chl-a (<jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <msup> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.82</mn> </math> </jats:inline-formula>, <jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <mtext>RMSE</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>14.52</mn> <mtext> </mtext> <mtext>mg</mtext> <mo>/</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mtext>m</mtext> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> </math> </jats:inline-formula>). As for Landsat-8, red to near-infrared ratio (<jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <mtext>B</mtext> <mn>4</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mtext>B</mtext> <mn>5</mn> </math> </jats:inline-formula>) produced the best performing model (<jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <msup> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.71</mn> </math> </jats:inline-formula>, <jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <mtext>RMSE</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>39.88</mn> <mtext> </mtext> <mtext>mg</mtext> <mo>/</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mtext>m</mtext> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> </math> </jats:inline-formula>), but it did not perform as well as Sentinel-2. Regarding turbidity, the best model (<jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7"> <msup> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.85</mn> </math> </jats:inline-formula>, <jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M8"> <mtext>RMSE</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.87</mn> </math> </jats:inline-formula> NTU) obtained by Sentinel-2 utilized a single band (B4), while the best model (with <jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M9"> <msup> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.64</mn> </math> </jats:inline-formula>, <jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M10"> <mtext>RMSE</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.90</mn> </math> </jats:inline-formula> NTU) using Landsat-8 was performed by applying two bands (<jats:inline-formula> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M11"> <mtext>B</mtext> <mn>1</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mtext>B</mtext> <mn>3</mn> </math> </jats:inline-formula>). Mapping the water quality parameters using the best performance biooptical model showed the significant effect of the adjacent land on the boundary pixels compared to pixels of deeper water.</jats:p>
- Access State: Open Access