• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Dose Escalation of Antidepressants in Unipolar Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Contributor: Dold, Markus; Bartova, Lucie; Rupprecht, Rainer; Kasper, Siegfried
  • imprint: S. Karger AG, 2017
  • Published in: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1159/000477770
  • ISSN: 0033-3190; 1423-0348
  • Keywords: Psychiatry and Mental health ; Applied Psychology ; Clinical Psychology ; General Medicine
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Background:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; As many patients with unipolar depression do not respond sufficiently to initial antidepressant monotherapy, a dose increase of the current administered antidepressant (dose escalation, high-dose treatment) is frequently carried out as next treatment measure. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; We conducted a meta-analysis which included all double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a dose increase of antidepressants directly to continuation of standard-dose treatment in unipolar depressive patients who were non- responders to standard-dose pharmacotherapy. A mean change in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were response rates and discontinuation rates due to any reason, inefficacy, and adverse effects. Hedges g and risk ratios were calculated as effect sizes. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Seven double-blind RCTs (8 study arms) representing 1,208 participants were included. Fluoxetine (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; [number of studies] = 2, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; [number of patients] = 448), sertraline (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 2, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 272), paroxetine (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 2, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 146), duloxetine (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 1, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 255), and maprotiline (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 1, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 87) were investigated. Dose escalation was not more efficacious in HAM-D total score reduction than maintaining standard-dose treatment, neither for the pooled antidepressant group (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 7, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 999; Hedges g = -0.04, 95% CI: -0.20 to 0.12; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.63) nor the individual antidepressants. No differences could be determined for response rates, all-cause discontinuation, and drop-outs due to inefficacy. Significantly more patients in the dose escalation group dropped out due to adverse effects than in the standard-dose continuation group. The metaregressions indicate no influence of baseline symptom severity or amounts of dose increments on effect sizes. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; According to our meta-analytic findings, dose escalation after initial non-response to standard-dose pharmacotherapy cannot be regarded as general evidence-based treatment option in unipolar depression.</jats:p>