Description:
<jats:p>The selection of model species tends to involve two typically unstated assumptions, namely: (1) that the similarity between species decreases steadily with phylogenetic distance, and (2) that similarities are greater at lower levels of biological organization. The first assumption holds on average, but species similarities tend to decrease with the square root of divergence time, rather than linearly, and lineages with short generation times (which includes most model species) tend to diverge faster than average, making the decrease in similarity non-monotonic. The second assumption is more difficult to test. Comparative molecular research has traditionally emphasized species similarities over differences, whereas comparative research at higher levels of organization frequently highlights the species differences. However, advances in comparative genomics have brought to light a great variety of species differences, not just in gene regulation but also in protein coding genes. Particularly relevant are cases in which homologous high-level characters are based on non-homologous genes. This phenomenon of non-orthologous gene displacement, or “deep non-homology,” indicates that species differences at the molecular level can be surprisingly large. Given these observations, it is not surprising that some findings obtained in model species do not generalize across species as well as researchers had hoped, even if the research is molecular.</jats:p>