• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: A Prospective, Randomised Comparison of Single- vs. Multiple-Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Penetrating Trauma
  • Contributor: Schmidt-Matthiesen, Andreas; Röding, Hans; Windolf, Joachim; Sommerfeldt, Dirk; Gutt, Carsten; Pannike, Alfred; Encke, Albrecht
  • imprint: S. Karger AG, 1999
  • Published in: Chemotherapy
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1159/000007229
  • ISSN: 1421-9794; 0009-3157
  • Keywords: Infectious Diseases ; Pharmacology (medical) ; Drug Discovery ; Pharmacology ; Oncology ; General Medicine
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:p>This study was designed to compare the clinical efficacy of a single dose of ceftriaxone with cefoxitin given 3 times a day for 3 days. &lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;/i&gt; Patients had to have a penetrating injury to only one part of the body, reach the hospital within 2 h and be operated on within 16 h after the trauma. Patients were excluded if it appeared likely that they would require mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h. The same applies to open or grade II/III craniocerebral trauma. The end point was the occurrence of infections within 10 days. The costs of antibiotic treatment were also calculated. &lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;/i&gt; 96% of the ceftriaxone patients (n = 97) and 95% of the cefoxitin group (n = 98) remained infection-free. In neither treatment group was deep infection, abscess, phlegmon or sepsis seen. No additional surgery or intensive care due to infection was required. At $41.83 vs. $172.16, the average total cost of delivering antibiotic treatment was significantly lower in the ceftriaxone group (p &lt; 0.001). &lt;i&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/i&gt; Prophylaxis in penetrating trauma with a single dose of ceftriaxone is safe and has considerable practical and economic advantages.</jats:p>