• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Abstract 13045: Metformin in Management of Diabetic Patients With Advanced Heart Failure (HFrEFf): A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
  • Contributor: Benes, Jan; Kotrc, Martin; Kroupova, Katerina; Wohlfahrt, Peter; Kovar, Jan; Franekova, Janka; Hegarova, Marketa; Hoskova, Lenka; Hoskova, Eva; Pelikanova, Terezie; Jarolim, Petr; Kautzner, Josef; Melenovsky, Vojtech
  • imprint: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2021
  • Published in: Circulation
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.13045
  • ISSN: 0009-7322; 1524-4539
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:p> <jats:bold>Introduction:</jats:bold> The role of metformin (MET) in the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is not firmly established. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Hypothesis:</jats:bold> Meformin treatment will be associated with better outcome even in DM patients with advanced HFrEF. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold> A total of 847 stable patients with advanced HFrEF (57.4± 11.3 years, 67.7% NYHA III/IV, LVEF 23.6± 5.8%) underwent clinical and laboratory evaluation and were prospectively followed for a median of 1126 (IQRs 410; 1781) days for occurrence of death, urgent heart transplantation or mechanical circulatory support implantation. A subgroup of 380 patients (44.9%) had DM, 87 of DM patients (22.9%) were treated with MET. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> Compared with MET-free diabetic patients, MET-treated individuals had similar fasting glucose, but worse DM control (Hb1Ac 60 mmol/mol, IQRs 50-73 vs. 52 IQRs 48-62, p=0.002), higher insulin, glucagon, β-hydroxybutyrate levels and increased insulin resistance (all p&lt; 0.05), but better quality of life (MLHFQ-score: 36 vs. 48 points, p= 0.002). Compared to diabetics treated with any other glucose-lowering agent, MET-treated patients had better event-free survival (p=0.0005, Fig. 1), which remained significant (p= 0.035) even after adjustment for BNP, BMI and eGFR. Propensity score-matched analysis with 17 covariates yielded 81 pairs of patients and showed a significantly better survival for MET-treated subgroup (p= 0.01). </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:bold>Conclusions:</jats:bold> MET treatment in patients with advanced HFrEF and DM is associated with better quality of life and improved outcome, by mechanisms beyond the improvement of blood glucose control. MET should stay among frontline drugs for treatment of HFrEF patients with DM. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="g13045.jpg" /> </jats:p> <jats:p>Supported by a grant no. NV19-02-00130 by Czech Health Research Council.</jats:p>
  • Access State: Open Access