You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Differential distribution of Met and epidermal growth factor receptor in normal and carcinogen-treated rat liver
Contributor:
Huitfeldt, H S;
Skarpen, E;
Lindeman, B;
Becher, R;
Thrane, E V;
Schwarze, P E
Published:
SAGE Publications, 1996
Published in:
Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 44 (1996) 3, Seite 227-233
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1177/44.3.8648082
ISSN:
0022-1554;
1551-5044
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
Transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are strong hepatocyte mitogens and important regulators of liver regeneration. The TGF-alpha receptor EGFr appears primarily to mediate a proliferative signal, whereas mitogenic, motogenic, and morphogenic effects have been attributed to activation of the HGF receptor Met. We have studied the localization of Met and EGFr in normal and carcinogen-treated rat livers. Oval cells and preneoplastic lesions were induced by diethylnitrosamine initiation, followed by promotion with 2-acetylaminofluorene combined with a partial hepatectomy. Different liver cell populations and their receptor expression were characterized by two-color immunofluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Hepatocytes were detected by keratin K8 staining, and oval cells and bile ducts were recognized by keratin K19 expression. Enzyme-altered preneoplastic lesions ere identified by expression of placental glutathione S-transferase (GST-pi). Staining for these cellular markers was combined with immunodetection of EGFr and Met. Normal liver exhibited strong staining for EGFr in hepatocytes, whereas blood vessels, bile ducts, and some sinusoidal cells were Met-positive. In carcinogen-treated livers, oval cells showed Met but not EGFr immunostaining. GST-pi-positive foci displayed EGFr immunostaining at a similar intensity as surrounding hepatocytes, whereas Met was not detected. Our data indicate that putative liver cells (oval cells) have a growth receptor phenotype similar to that of bile ducts, whereas preneoplastic live lesions appear hepatocyte-like. These results indicate that the preferential proliferation of preneoplastic liver lesions compared to surrounding hepatocytes is not associated with an altered EGFr or Met phenotype.