> Details

Runyan, Christopher M.; Uribe‐Rivera, Armando; Karlea, Audrey; Meinzen‐Derr, Jareen; Rothchild, Dawn; Saal, Howard; Hopkin, Robert J.; Gordon, Christopher B.

Cost Analysis of Mandibular Distraction versus Tracheostomy in Neonates with Pierre Robin Sequence

Reference
management

Bookmarks

Remove from
bookmarks

Share this on Whatsapp

Close

Bookmarks



You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
  • Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Cost Analysis of Mandibular Distraction versus Tracheostomy in Neonates with Pierre Robin Sequence
  • Contributor: Runyan, Christopher M.; Uribe‐Rivera, Armando; Karlea, Audrey; Meinzen‐Derr, Jareen; Rothchild, Dawn; Saal, Howard; Hopkin, Robert J.; Gordon, Christopher B.
  • imprint: Wiley, 2014
  • Published in: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1177/0194599814542759
  • ISSN: 0194-5998; 1097-6817
  • Keywords: Otorhinolaryngology ; Surgery
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate costs associated with surgical treatment for neonates with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Study Design</jats:title><jats:p>Retrospective cohort study.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Subjects and Methods</jats:title><jats:p>With Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively studied neonates with PRS treated from 2001 to 2009 with either tracheostomy (Trach), mandibular distraction (MD), or Trach with subsequent MD (Trach+MD). Actual charges over a 3‐year period associated with operative costs, hospital stay, imaging and sleep studies, clinic visits, and related emergency room visits were collected. Home tracheostomy care charges were estimated individually for each patient. Charges were compared using regression and appropriate statistical analyses.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Forty‐seven neonates were included in the study (MD, n = 26; Trach, n = 12; Trach+MD, n = 9). Trach group patients had 2.6‐fold higher charges than the MD group despite no difference in length of hospital stay. This difference increased to 7.3‐fold when including home trach care‐related costs. Trach+MD group patients had longer hospital lengths of stay and higher operation room (OR) fees, but no increased total charges compared with the Trach only group.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>For patients with severe PRS, mandibular distraction provides significant cost savings over tracheostomy ($300,000 per patient over 3 years). Increased costs with tracheostomy come from greater hospital‐related charges, more frequent airway procedures, a higher incidence of gastrostomy tube feeds, and home trach care costs. A careful examination of long‐term outcomes will be critical as mandibular distraction continues to gain acceptance for treatment of PRS.</jats:p></jats:sec>