Thoracic-abdominal imaging with a novel dual-layer spectral detector CT: intra-individual comparison of image quality and radiation dose with 128-row single-energy acquisition
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Thoracic-abdominal imaging with a novel dual-layer spectral detector CT: intra-individual comparison of image quality and radiation dose with 128-row single-energy acquisition
Description:
<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> A novel, multi-energy, dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) is commercially available now with the vendor’s claim that it yields the same or better quality of polychromatic, conventional CT images like modern single-energy CT scanners without any radiation dose penalty. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p> To intra-individually compare the quality of conventional polychromatic CT images acquired with a dual-layer spectral detector (SDCT) and the latest generation 128-row single-energy-detector (CT128) from the same manufacturer. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Material and Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Fifty patients underwent portal-venous phase, thoracic-abdominal CT scans with the SDCT and prior CT128 imaging. The SDCT scanning protocol was adapted to yield a similar estimated dose length product (DLP) as the CT128. Patient dose optimization by automatic tube current modulation and CT image reconstruction with a state-of-the-art iterative algorithm were identical on both scanners. CT image contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was compared between the SDCT and CT128 in different anatomic structures. Image quality and noise were assessed independently by two readers with 5-point-Likert-scales. Volume CT dose index (CTDI<jats:sub>vol</jats:sub>), and DLP were recorded and normalized to 68 cm acquisition length (DLP<jats:sub>68</jats:sub>). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> The SDCT yielded higher mean CNR values of 30.0% ± 2.0% (26.4–32.5%) in all anatomic structures ( P < 0.001) and excellent scores for qualitative parameters surpassing the CT128 (all P < 0.0001) with substantial inter-rater agreement (κ ≥ 0.801). Despite adapted scan protocols the SDCT yielded lower values for CTDI<jats:sub>vol</jats:sub> (–10.1 ± 12.8%), DLP (−13.1 ± 13.9%), and DLP<jats:sub>68</jats:sub> (–15.3 ± 16.9%) than the CT128 (all P < 0.0001). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> The SDCT scanner yielded better CT image quality compared to the CT128 and lower radiation dose parameters. </jats:p></jats:sec>